Scot's Law of Contracts Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Scots Law of Contracts - Essay ExampleThe paper gives detailed information about weighs that are formed where whole the concerned parties admit arrived at an conformity. This is in terms of the stipulations of the contract and in willingness to see the contract out without duress. In legal terms, consensus in idem essential be achieved for a contract to be deemed as binding. Not all terms in the contract must be agreed upon. However, the most essential ones must be agreed when the parties meet. Another tenet of the Scottish Law of Contracts is that it must not always be in writing. The Requirements of Writing Act 1995 clearly states that a contract must not always be pen contrary to belief by people who are not essentially lawyers. The conduct of the parties, the intercommunicate word or a combination of these may be used in the formation of a contract as much as the written word. The Scottish Law of Contracts requires that consensus in idem be reached. This means that regardl ess of the means that the contract was formed, there must be a consensus that was reached by the parties. It is possible for the parties in a contract to presuppose that they have come to a consensus sole(prenominal) for the court to overturn that belief. This is so especially when the parties think that they have reached an agreement still for the court to ask whether a reasonable person, given all the facts in the case would have acted in the same way. A contract has to have an agreement at least on the essential terms.... Additionally, she cannot claim that in court of law as ultimately, she would have to prove that a legally binding contract did indeed exist between her and the customer. The Scottish Law of Contracts requires that consensus in idem be reached. This means that regardless of the means that the contract was formed, there must be a consensus that was reached by the parties. It is possible for the parties in a contract to think that they have come to a consensus o nly for the court to overturn that belief. This is so especially when the parties think that they have reached an agreement only for the court to ask whether a reasonable person, given all the facts in the case would have acted in the same way. In this case, Arju was not under any obligation to heed the recommendations of the other customer as ultimately, she had not approached him but he had approached her. Therefore, a reasonable person would have pointed out that she was not under any obligation to buy the AK47 Watersquirt and hence no contract could have been made. As Arjus lawyer, I would not advice her to fulfil the customer as there was no contract between him and her. Case A2 In this scenario, Arju comes across a sales assistant who is wearing the stores uniform and having a label home decoration expert. The assistant concedes that he does not have enough knowledge on power washers but states that the store only stocks the best appliances meaning that whichever she chose wo uld do the job just right. Here, the assistant is in a legal capacity to enter into a contract with the customers on behalf of the store. Therefore, Arju had the guarantee that whichever power washer she chose would do the job that she required it to. As seen earlier, a